x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland | 68-0329422 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
One Belvedere Place, Suite 300 Mill Valley, California |
94941 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share | 78,706,126 shares outstanding as of August 3, 2011 |
i
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) (Unaudited) |
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Residential real estate loans | $ | 3,860,233 | $ | 3,797,095 | ||||
Commercial real estate loans | 83,866 | 50,386 | ||||||
Real estate securities, at fair value: |
||||||||
Trading securities | 296,978 | 329,717 | ||||||
Available-for-sale securities | 740,623 | 825,119 | ||||||
Total real estate securities | 1,037,601 | 1,154,836 | ||||||
Other investments | | | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 79,977 | 46,937 | ||||||
Total earning assets | 5,061,677 | 5,049,254 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 35,673 | 24,524 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 13,690 | 13,782 | ||||||
Derivative assets | 4,013 | 8,051 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset | | 3,487 | ||||||
Deferred securities issuance costs | 6,472 | 5,928 | ||||||
Other assets | 43,463 | 38,662 | ||||||
Total Assets(1) | $ | 5,164,988 | $ | 5,143,688 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Short-term debt | $ | 40,891 | $ | 44,137 | ||||
Accrued interest payable | 6,422 | 5,930 | ||||||
Derivative liabilities | 82,639 | 83,115 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 9,954 | 14,305 | ||||||
Dividends payable | 19,640 | 19,531 | ||||||
Asset-backed securities issued Sequoia | 3,566,001 | 3,458,501 | ||||||
Asset-backed securities issued Acacia | 273,325 | 303,077 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 139,500 | 139,500 | ||||||
Total liabilities(2) | 4,138,372 | 4,068,096 | ||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 125,000,000 shares authorized; 78,554,965 and 78,124,668 issued and outstanding | 786 | 781 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,694,077 | 1,689,851 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 80,621 | 112,339 | ||||||
Cumulative earnings | 502,544 | 474,940 | ||||||
Cumulative distributions to stockholders | (1,253,518 | ) | (1,213,158 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity | 1,024,510 | 1,064,753 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 2,106 | 10,839 | ||||||
Total equity | 1,026,616 | 1,075,592 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 5,164,988 | $ | 5,143,688 |
(1) | Our consolidated balance sheets include assets of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) that can only be used to settle obligations of these VIEs. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, these assets totaled $4,005,933 and $3,941,212, respectively. |
(2) | Our consolidated balance sheets include liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors do not have recourse to the primary beneficiary (Redwood Trust, Inc.). At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, these liabilities totaled $3,912,958 and $3,838,386, respectively. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) (Unaudited) |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Interest Income |
||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans | $ | 18,904 | $ | 15,746 | $ | 37,372 | $ | 30,235 | ||||||||
Commercial real estate loans | 1,800 | 269 | 3,025 | 573 | ||||||||||||
Real estate securities | 32,234 | 40,458 | 66,859 | 84,357 | ||||||||||||
Other investments | | 4 | | 13 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 17 | 93 | 32 | 110 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income | 52,955 | 56,570 | 107,288 | 115,288 | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Short-term debt | (7 | ) | (36 | ) | (189 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||||
Asset-backed securities issued | (21,251 | ) | (18,988 | ) | (40,675 | ) | (36,054 | ) | ||||||||
Long-term debt | (2,375 | ) | (2,140 | ) | (4,742 | ) | (3,256 | ) | ||||||||
Total interest expense | (23,633 | ) | (21,164 | ) | (45,606 | ) | (39,346 | ) | ||||||||
Net Interest Income | 29,322 | 35,406 | 61,682 | 75,942 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | (1,581 | ) | (4,321 | ) | (4,389 | ) | (13,797 | ) | ||||||||
Market valuation adjustments | (9,681 | ) | (2,909 | ) | (12,799 | ) | (12,200 | ) | ||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairments(1) | (1,466 | ) | (4,216 | ) | (4,088 | ) | (6,162 | ) | ||||||||
Market valuation adjustments, net | (11,147 | ) | (7,125 | ) | (16,887 | ) | (18,362 | ) | ||||||||
Net Interest Income After Provision and Market Valuation Adjustments | 16,594 | 23,960 | 40,406 | 43,783 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | (12,087 | ) | (11,227 | ) | (23,600 | ) | (28,533 | ) | ||||||||
Realized gains on sales and calls, net | 5,834 | 16,080 | 9,699 | 60,417 | ||||||||||||
Net income before provision for income taxes | 10,341 | 28,813 | 26,505 | 75,667 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (14 | ) | (26 | ) | (28 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | 10,327 | 28,787 | 26,477 | 75,615 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest | 888 | 186 | (1,127 | ) | 171 | |||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Redwood Trust, Inc. | $ | 9,439 | $ | 28,601 | $ | 27,604 | $ | 75,444 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.94 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.94 | ||||||||
Regular dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.50 | ||||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 78,324,057 | 77,800,642 | 78,176,767 | 77,739,279 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 79,477,504 | 78,852,259 | 79,425,360 | 78,661,642 |
(1) | For the three months ended June 30, 2011, other-than-temporary impairments were $2,655, of which $1,189 were recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, other-than-temporary impairments were $7,086, of which $2,870 were recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. |
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, other-than-temporary impairments were $5,967, of which $1,879 were recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, other-than-temporary impairments were $10,701, of which $4,539 were recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) (Unaudited) |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Cumulative Earnings |
Cumulative Distributions to Stockholders |
Noncontrolling Interest |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | 78,124,668 | $ | 781 | $ | 1,689,851 | $ | 112,339 | $ | 474,940 | $ | (1,213,158 | ) | $ | 10,839 | $ | 1,075,592 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | | | | | 27,604 | | (1,127 | ) | 26,477 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities | | | | (34,683 | ) | | | 4,164 | (30,519 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of other-than-temporary impairments to net income | | | | 2,349 | | | | 2,349 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on interest rate agreements | | | | (1,528 | ) | | | | (1,528 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of unrealized loss on interest rate agreements to net income | | | | 2,144 | | | | 2,144 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss | (31,718 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | (1,077 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment & stock purchase plans | 158,028 | 2 | 2,349 | | | | | 2,351 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee stock purchase and incentive plans | 272,269 | 3 | (2,929 | ) | | | | | (2,926 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cash equity award compensation | | | 4,806 | | | | | 4,806 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest, net | | | | | | | (11,770 | ) | (11,770 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared | | | | | | (40,360 | ) | | (40,360 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | 78,554,965 | $ | 786 | $ | 1,694,077 | $ | 80,621 | $ | 502,544 | $ | (1,253,518 | ) | $ | 2,106 | $ | 1,026,616 |
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) (Unaudited) |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Cumulative Earnings |
Cumulative Distributions to Stockholders |
Noncontrolling Interest |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | 77,737,130 | $ | 777 | $ | 1,674,367 | $ | 64,860 | $ | 364,888 | $ | (1,133,171 | ) | $ | 17,370 | $ | 989,091 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | | | | | 75,444 | | 171 | 75,615 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities | | | | (12,987 | ) | | | 2,090 | (10,897 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of other-than-temporary impairments to net income | | | | 5,411 | | | | 5,411 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on interest rate agreements | | | | (20,631 | ) | | | | (20,631 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of unrealized loss on interest rate agreements to net income | | | | 1,546 | | | | 1,546 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss | (26,661 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive gain | 51,044 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment & stock purchase plans | 122,483 | 2 | 1,974 | | | | | 1,976 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee stock purchase and incentive plans | 48,826 | | (245 | ) | | | | | (245 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cash equity award compensation | | | 8,208 | | | | | 8,208 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest, net | | | | | | | (7,638 | ) | (7,638 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared | | | | | | (39,908 | ) | | (39,908 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | 77,908,439 | $ | 779 | $ | 1,684,304 | $ | 38,199 | $ | 440,332 | $ | (1,173,079 | ) | $ | 11,993 | $ | 1,002,528 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) (Unaudited) |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net income attributable to Redwood Trust, Inc. | $ | 27,604 | $ | 75,444 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Amortization of premiums, discounts, and debt issuance costs, net | (17,462 | ) | (16,409 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization of non-financial assets | 515 | 439 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 4,389 | 13,797 | ||||||
Non-cash equity award compensation | 4,806 | 8,208 | ||||||
Market valuation adjustments, net | 16,887 | 18,362 | ||||||
Realized gains on sales and calls, net | (9,699 | ) | (60,417 | ) | ||||
Net change in: |
||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | (199 | ) | 3,732 | |||||
Deferred tax asset | 3,487 | 2,358 | ||||||
Other assets | 123 | (13,079 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest payable | 6,851 | 5,602 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | (4,351 | ) | (61,644 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 32,951 | (23,607 | ) | |||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of real estate loans held-for-investment | (293,445 | ) | (238,076 | ) | ||||
Principal payments on real estate loans held-for-investment | 181,840 | 148,647 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate loans held-for-sale | 1,857 | | ||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities | (46,498 | ) | (186,057 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities | 72,666 | 247,528 | ||||||
Principal payments on available-for-sale securities | 58,416 | 71,083 | ||||||
Purchases of real estate securities trading | | (17,137 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales of trading securities | 13,035 | 6,119 | ||||||
Principal payments on trading securities | 30,261 | 31,102 | ||||||
Principal payments on other investments | | 9,675 | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in restricted cash | (11,149 | ) | 67,492 | |||||
Net cash provided by investing activities | 6,983 | 140,376 | ||||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Net repayments on short-term debt | (3,246 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of asset-backed securities | 281,456 | 211,178 | ||||||
Repurchase of asset-backed securities | | (8,639 | ) | |||||
Deferred securities issuance costs | (1,695 | ) | (1,667 | ) | ||||
Repayments on asset-backed securities | (214,950 | ) | (200,214 | ) | ||||
Net settlements of derivatives | (14,733 | ) | (26,268 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock | (580 | ) | 1,731 | |||||
Dividends paid | (40,250 | ) | (39,865 | ) | ||||
Change in noncontrolling interests | (12,896 | ) | (7,467 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (6,894 | ) | (71,211 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 33,040 | 45,558 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | $ | 46,937 | $ | 242,818 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 79,977 | $ | 288,376 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosures: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 36,404 | $ | 32,646 | ||||
Cash paid for taxes | $ | 45 | $ | 15 | ||||
Dividends declared but not paid at end of period | $ | 19,640 | $ | 19,477 | ||||
Transfers from real estate loans to real estate owned | $ | 5,966 | $ | 8,925 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Redwood Trust, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (Redwood, we, or us), invests in, finances, and manages real estate assets. We invest in residential and commercial real estate loans and in asset-backed securities backed by real estate loans. We seek to invest in assets that have the potential to generate sufficient long-term cash flow returns to support our goal of distributing an attractive level of dividends per share to shareholders over time. For tax purposes, we are structured as a real estate investment trust (REIT).
Redwood was incorporated in the State of Maryland on April 11, 1994, and commenced operations on August 19, 1994. Our executive offices are located at One Belvedere Place, Suite 300, Mill Valley, California 94941.
The consolidated financial statements presented herein are at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America as prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) and using the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) instructions to Form 10-Q. All amounts presented herein, except share data, are shown in thousands.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Redwood, its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, and other entities in which we have a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. A number of Redwoods consolidated subsidiaries are qualifying REIT subsidiaries and the remainder are taxable subsidiaries. References to the Redwood REIT include Redwood and its qualifying REIT subsidiaries, excluding taxable subsidiaries.
We sponsor two securitization programs. Our Sequoia program is used for the securitization of residential mortgage loans. References to Sequoia refer collectively to all the consolidated Sequoia securitization entities. Our Acacia program was used for the securitization of mortgage-backed securities and other types of financial assets. References to Acacia refer collectively to all the consolidated Acacia securitization entities. We are also the asset manager for and an investor in the Redwood Opportunity Fund LP (the Fund) that we sponsor.
We apply FASB guidance to determine whether we must consolidate transferred financial assets and variable interest entities (VIEs) for financial reporting purposes. We currently consolidate the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the Fund, as well as the assets and liabilities of the Sequoia and the Acacia securitization entities where we maintain a continuing involvement. Each securitization entity is independent of Redwood and of each other and the assets and liabilities are not owned by and are not obligations of Redwood, although we are exposed to certain financial risks associated with our role as the sponsor or manager of these entities.
For financial reporting purposes, the underlying loans and securities owned at Sequoia and Acacia entities are shown on our consolidated balance sheets under real estate loans and real estate securities and the asset-backed securities (ABS) issued to third-parties by these entities are shown under ABS issued. In our consolidated statements of income, we record interest income on the loans and securities owned by consolidated Sequoia and Acacia entities and interest expense on the ABS issued by these entities. The real estate securities owned at the Fund are shown on our consolidated balance sheets under real estate securities and the portion of the Fund owned by third-parties is shown under noncontrolling interest. In our consolidated statements of income, we record interest income on the securities owned at the Fund. Since the Fund is currently funded with equity, there is no associated interest expense.
5
See Note 4 for further discussion on principles of consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements requires us to make a number of significant estimates. These include estimates of fair value of certain assets and liabilities, amount and timing of credit losses, prepayment rates, and other estimates that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reported period. It is likely that changes in these estimates (e.g., valuation changes due to supply and demand, credit performance, prepayments, interest rates, or other reasons) will occur in the near term. Our estimates are inherently subjective in nature and actual results could differ from our estimates and the differences could be material.
Our financial statements include assets and liabilities that are measured at their estimated fair values in accordance with GAAP. A fair value measurement represents the price at which an orderly transaction would occur between willing market participants at the measurement date. We develop fair values for financial assets or liabilities based on available inputs and pricing that is observed in the marketplace. Examples of market information that we attempt to obtain include the following:
| Quoted prices for the same or similar securities; |
| Relevant reports issued by analysts and rating agencies; |
| The current level of interest rates and any directional movements in relevant indices, such as credit risk indices; |
| Information about the performance of the underlying mortgage loans, such as delinquency and foreclosure rates, loss experience, and prepayment rates; |
| Indicative prices or yields from broker/dealers; and, |
| Other relevant observable inputs, including nonperformance risk and liquidity premiums. |
After considering all available indications of the appropriate rate of return that market participants would require, we consider the reasonableness of the range indicated by the results to determine an estimate that is most representative of fair value.
The markets for many of the real estate securities that we invest in and issue are generally illiquid. Establishing fair values for illiquid assets and liabilities is inherently subjective and is often dependent upon our estimates and modeling assumptions. If we determine that either the volume and/or level of trading activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased from normal market conditions, or price quotations or observable inputs are not associated with orderly transactions, the market inputs that we obtain might not be relevant. For example, broker or pricing service quotes might not be relevant if an active market does not exist for the financial asset or liability. The nature of the quote (for example, whether the quote is an indicative price or a binding offer) is also evaluated.
In circumstances where relevant market inputs cannot be obtained, increased analysis and management judgment are required to estimate fair value. This generally requires us to establish the use of our internal assumptions about future cash flows and appropriate risk-adjusted discount rates. Regardless of the valuation inputs we apply, the objective of fair value measurement is unchanged from what it would be if markets were operating at normal activity levels and/or transactions were orderly; that is, to determine the current exit price.
6
See Note 5 for further discussion on fair value measurements.
We have the option to measure eligible financial assets, financial liabilities, and commitments at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. This option is available when we first recognize a financial asset or financial liability or enter into a firm commitment. Subsequent changes in the fair value of assets, liabilities, and commitments where we have elected the fair value option are recorded in our consolidated statements of income.
Our decision to apply the fair value option for new financial instruments is generally based upon our funding strategy for the specific financial asset acquired. For example, securities that we anticipate funding with equity will generally be accounted for as available-for-sale (AFS) securities. Securities that we anticipate funding with a combination of debt and equity or those financed through the issuance of asset-backed liabilities will generally be accounted for in a manner consistent with the associated liabilities. Additionally, we may elect to apply the fair value option for financial instruments that may not perform similarly to our traditional real estate investments or are particularly volatile or complex.
See Note 5 for further discussion on the fair value option.
Residential and commercial real estate loans at fair value include loans where we have elected the fair value option. Coupon interest is recognized as revenue when earned and deemed collectible or until a loan becomes more than 90 days past due. Changes in fair value are recurring and are reported through our consolidated statements of income in market valuation adjustments, net.
Residential and commercial real estate loans held-for-sale include loans that we are marketing for sale to third-parties. These loans are carried at the lower of their cost or fair value, as measured on an individual basis. If the fair value of a loan held-for-sale is lower than its amortized cost basis, this difference is reported as a negative market valuation adjustment through our consolidated statements of income. Coupon interest for loans held-for-sale is recognized as revenue when earned and deemed collectible or until a loan becomes more than 90 days past due. Gains or losses on the sale of real estate loans are based on the specific identification method.
Real estate loans held-for-investment include residential real estate loans owned and securitized at Sequoia entities and residential and commercial real estate loans owned at Redwood. These loans are carried at their unpaid principal balances adjusted for net unamortized premiums or discounts and net of any allowance for loan losses. Coupon interest is recognized as revenue when earned and deemed collectible or until a loan becomes more than 90 days past due or when a loan has been individually impaired, at which point the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. Interest previously accrued for loans that have become greater than 90 days past due or individually impaired is reserved for in the allowance for loan losses. Loans delinquent more than 90 days or in foreclosure are characterized as seriously delinquent. Cash principal and interest that is advanced from servicers subsequent to a loan becoming greater than 90 days past due or individually impaired is used to reduce the outstanding loan principal balance. When a seriously delinquent loan previously placed on nonaccrual status has cured, meaning all delinquent principal and interest have been remitted by the borrower, the loan is placed back on accrual status. Loans that have been individually impaired are placed back on accrual status once the loan is considered reperforming.
7
We use the interest method to determine an effective yield to amortize the premium or discount on real estate loans held-for-investment. For residential loans acquired prior to July 1, 2004, we use coupon interest rates as they change over time and anticipated principal payments to determine periodic amortization. For loans acquired after July 1, 2004, we use the initial coupon interest rate of the loans (without regard to future changes in the underlying indices) and anticipated principal payments, if any, to determine periodic amortization.
We reclassify loans held-for-investment as loans held-for-sale if we determine that these loans will be sold to third-parties. This may occur, for example, if we exercise our right to call ABS issued by a Sequoia securitization trust and decide to subsequently sell the underlying loans to third-parties.
See Note 6 for further discussion on real estate loans.
For residential real estate loans classified as held-for-investment, we establish and maintain an allowance for loan losses based on our estimate of credit losses inherent in our loan portfolios at the reporting date. To calculate the allowance for loan losses, we assess inherent losses by determining loss factors (defaults, the timing of defaults, and loss severities upon defaults) that can be specifically applied to each of the consolidated loans or pools of loans.
We consider the following factors in setting the allowance for loan losses:
| Ongoing analyses of loans, including, but not limited to, the age of loans and year of origination, underwriting standards, business climate, economic conditions, and other observable data; |
| Historical loss rates and past performance of similar loans; |
| Relevant environmental factors; |
| Relevant market research and publicly available third-party reference loss rates; |
| Trends in delinquencies and charge-offs; |
| Effects and changes in credit concentrations; |
| Information supporting a borrowers ability to meet obligations; |
| Ongoing evaluations of fair values of collateral using current appraisals and other valuations; and, |
| Discounted cash flow analyses. |
Once we determine the amount of defaults, the timing of the defaults, and severity of losses upon the defaults, we estimate expected losses for each individual loan or pool of loans over its expected life. We then estimate the timing of these losses and the losses probable to occur over an appropriate loss confirmation period. This period is defined as the range of time between the occurrence of a credit loss (such as the initial deterioration of the borrowers financial condition) and the confirmation of that loss (the actual impairment or charge-off of the loan). The losses expected to occur within the estimated loss confirmation period are the basis of our allowance for loan losses, since we believe these losses exist at the reported date of the financial statements. We re-evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses quarterly.
As part of the loss mitigation efforts undertaken by servicers of residential loans owned by Sequoia securitization entities, a growing number of loan modifications have been completed to help make mortgage loans more affordable for certain borrowers. Loan modifications may include, but are not limited to: (i) conversion of a floating rate mortgage loan into a fixed rate mortgage loan; (ii) reduction in the contractual interest rate of a mortgage loan; (iii) forgiveness of a portion of the contractual interest and/or principal
8
amounts owed on a mortgage loan; and, (iv) extension of the contractual maturity of a mortgage loan. We evaluate all loan modifications performed by servicers to determine if they constitute troubled debt restructurings according to GAAP. If a loan is determined to be a troubled debt restructuring (TDR), it is removed from the general loan pools used for calculating allowances for loan losses and assessed for impairment on an individual basis based upon any adverse change in the expected future cash flows resulting from the modification. This difference is recorded to the provision for loan losses in our consolidated statements of income.
When foreclosed property is received in full satisfaction for a defaulted loan, we estimate the specific loan loss, if any, based on estimated net proceeds from the sale of the property (including accrued but unpaid interest and other costs) and charge this specific estimated loss against the allowance for loan losses. Foreclosed property is subsequently recorded as real estate owned (REO), a component of other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. Actual losses incurred on loans liquidated through a short-sale are also charged against the allowance for loan losses.
We do not currently maintain a loan repurchase reserve and management is not aware of any outstanding repurchase claims against Redwood that would require the establishment of such a reserve. We do not originate residential loans and believe that risk of loss due to loan repurchases (i.e., due to breach of representations and warranties) would generally be a contingency to the companies from whom we acquired the loans and therefore would be covered by our recourse to those companies.
In circumstances where we believe that there is a risk of loss due to a loan repurchase demand (i.e., due to an allegation of a breach of representations and warranties) and we do not believe that full recourse to the company from whom we acquired the loan exists or is enforceable, we will review the need for any loan repurchase reserve in accordance with FASB guidance on accounting for contingencies and establish reserves when, in the opinion of management, it is probable that a matter would result in a liability and the amount of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated.
For commercial real estate loans classified as held-for-investment, we establish and maintain an allowance for loan losses on an individual basis for those loans we have determined to be impaired as of the reporting date. To calculate the allowance for loan losses, we assess each loan for indications of adverse credit conditions such as delinquencies or changes in expected future cash flows. Upon identification of an adverse credit condition, the loans are evaluated for impairment and any resulting impairment is recorded in the provision for loan losses in our consolidated statements of income. We re-evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses at least quarterly.
See Note 7 for further discussion on the allowance for loan losses.
Trading securities include residential, commercial, and collateralized debt obligation (CDO) securities. Trading securities are carried at their estimated fair values. Coupon interest is recognized as interest income when earned and deemed collectible. All changes in fair value are reported through our consolidated statements of income in market valuation adjustments, net.
We primarily denote trading securities as those securities where we have adopted the fair value option. We currently account for certain securities at Redwood and all securities at Acacia entities as trading securities, at fair value.
9
AFS securities include certain residential, commercial, and CDO securities. AFS securities are carried at their estimated fair values with cumulative unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in our consolidated statements of equity. Coupon interest is recognized as interest income when earned and deemed collectible, and the interest method is used to determine an effective yield to amortize purchase premiums, discounts, and fees associated with these securities into income over time. This requires us to project cash flows over the remaining life of each security and make assumptions with regards to interest rates, prepayment rates, the timing and amount of credit losses, and other factors. We review our cash flow projections on an ongoing basis and monitor these projections based on input and analyses received from external sources, internal models, and our own judgment and experience.
For an AFS security where its fair value has declined below its amortized cost basis, we evaluate the security for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI). If we either (i) intend to sell the impaired security; (ii) will more likely than not be required to the sell the impaired security before it recovers in value; or, (iii) do not expect to recover the impaired securitys amortized cost basis even if we do not intend to sell the security the impairment is deemed an OTTI and we record the entire difference between the securitys fair value and its amortized cost in our consolidated statements of income. Conversely, if none of these three conditions is met, we analyze the expected cash flows, or cost recovery of the security, to determine what, if any, OTTI is recognized through our consolidated statements of income. This analysis includes an assessment of any changes in the regulatory and/or economic environment that might affect the performance of the security.
If we conclude through our analysis that there has been no significant adverse change in our cash flow assumptions for the security, then the impairment is deemed temporary in nature and the associated difference between the securitys fair value and its amortized cost basis is recorded as an unrealized loss through accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of equity. Alternatively, if we conclude that there has been a significant adverse change in our cash flow assumptions for the security, then the impairment is deemed an OTTI and we perform an additional analysis to determine what portion of OTTI, if any, should be recorded through our consolidated statements of income. This analysis entails discounting the securitys cash flows to a present value using the prior period yield for the security to determine an expected recoverable value. The difference between this expected recoverable value and the amortized cost basis of the security is deemed to be the credit component of the OTTI that is recorded in our consolidated statements of income. The amortized cost of the security is then adjusted to the expected recoverable value, and the difference between this expected recoverable value and the fair value is deemed to be the non-credit component of the OTTI that is recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income. Future amortization and accretion for the security is computed based upon the new amortized cost basis.
See Note 8 for further discussion on real estate securities.
Other investments included a guaranteed investment contract (GIC) entered into by an Acacia securitization entity that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes. At December 31, 2010, the GIC had been drawn down completely to cover credit losses and principal reductions on the referenced securities. We accounted for this investment at its estimated fair value. Changes in fair value were reported through our consolidated statements of income through market valuation adjustments, net. Interest income was reported through our consolidated statements of income through interest income, other investments. This GIC represented a deposit certificate issued by a rated investment bank and serves as collateral to cover realized losses on credit default swaps (CDS) entered into by this same Acacia entity.
10
Cash and cash equivalents include non-restricted cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. At June 30, 2011, we did not have any significant concentrations of credit risk arising from cash deposits as all of our cash and cash equivalents were invested in FDIC-insured bank products.
Restricted cash primarily includes principal and interest payments that are collateral for, or payable to, owners of ABS issued by consolidated securitization entities. Restricted cash may also include cash retained in Acacia or Sequoia securitization entities prior to the payments on or redemptions of outstanding ABS issued, or in the Fund prior to distributions to limited partners. At June 30, 2011, we did not have any significant concentrations of credit risk arising from restricted cash deposits as all of our restricted cash was held in custodial accounts or FDIC-insured bank products.
Accrued interest receivable includes interest that is due and payable to us. Cash interest is generally received within thirty days of recording the receivable. For financial assets where we have elected the fair value option, the associated accrued interest on these assets is measured at fair value. For financial assets where we have not elected the fair value option, the associated accrued interest carrying values approximate fair values.
Derivative financial instruments include risk management derivatives namely interest rate agreements and credit derivatives. All derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. Derivatives with a positive fair value to us are reported as an asset and derivatives with a negative fair value to us are reported as a liability. We classify each of our derivative financial instruments as either (i) a trading instrument (no hedging designation) or (ii) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge).
Changes in fair value of derivatives accounted for as trading instruments, including any associated interest income or expense, are recorded in our consolidated statements of income through market valuation adjustments, net. Changes in the fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of equity. Interest income or expense and any ineffectiveness associated with these hedging derivatives are recorded as a component of net interest income in our consolidated statements of income. We measure the effective portion of cash flow hedges by comparing the change in fair value of the expected future variable cash flows of the derivative hedging instruments with the change in fair value of the expected future variable cash flows of the hedged liabilities.
We will discontinue cash flow hedge accounting if (i) we determine that the hedging derivative is no longer expected to be effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the designated hedged item; (ii) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) the derivative is de-designated as a cash flow hedge; or, (iv) it is probable that a forecasted transaction associated with the hedged item will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period. To the extent we de-designate a cash flow hedging relationship but the associated hedged item continues to exist, the fair value of the cash flow hedge at the time of de-designation remains in accumulated other comprehensive income and is amortized using the straight-line method through interest expense over the remaining life of the hedged liability.
11
Risk management derivatives that we currently utilize include interest rate swaps and caps. Interest rate swaps are derivative contracts in which (i) one party exchanges a stream of fixed interest payments for another partys stream of variable interest cash flows; or, (ii) each party exchanges variable interest cash flows that are referenced to different indices. Interest rate caps are derivative contracts in which the buyer receives payments at the end of each period in which the interest rate exceeds an agreed upon strike price. We enter into interest rate swaps and caps primarily to reduce significant changes in our income or equity caused by interest rate volatility. Certain of these interest rate agreements may be designated as cash flow hedges.
Other risk management derivatives we currently utilize include To Be Announced (TBA) contracts and financial futures contracts such as Eurodollar futures and Treasury futures. TBA contracts are forward commitments to purchase agency mortgage-backed securities to be issued in the future. Financial futures are futures contracts on short-term benchmark interest rates. We purchase or sell these hedging instruments to offset to varying degrees changes in the values of mortgage products for which we have exposure.
Credit derivatives that we have historically utilized include CDS, which are agreements to provide (receive) credit event protection based on a financial index or specific security in exchange for receiving (paying) a fixed-rate fee or premium over the term of the contract. These instruments enable us, or our consolidated securitization entities, to synthetically assume the credit risk of a reference security or index of securities. The estimated fair values of these contracts fluctuate for a variety of reasons, such as the likelihood or occurrence of a qualifying credit event (e.g., an interest shortfall, a failure to pay principal, or a distressed rating downgrade), the market perception of default risk and counterparty risk, and supply and demand changes. We do not designate any credit derivatives as cash flow hedges.
See Note 9 for further discussion on derivative financial instruments.
Our deferred tax assets are generated by differences in GAAP and taxable income at our taxable subsidiaries. These differences generally reflect differing accounting treatments for tax and GAAP, such as accounting for discount and premium amortization, credit losses, equity awards, asset impairments, and certain valuation estimates. As a result of these differences, we may recognize taxable income in periods prior to when we recognize income for GAAP. When this occurs, we pay the tax liability and establish a deferred tax asset for GAAP. As the income is subsequently realized in future periods under GAAP, the deferred tax asset is reduced.
Securities issuance costs are expenses associated with the issuance of long-term debt and ABS from the Sequoia securitization entities we sponsor. These expenses typically include underwriting, rating agency, legal, accounting, and other fees. ABS issuance costs associated with liabilities accounted for under the fair value option are expensed as incurred. ABS issuance costs associated with liabilities reported at cost are deferred. Deferred ABS issuance costs are reported on our consolidated balance sheets as deferred charges (an asset) and are amortized as an adjustment to interest expense using the interest method, based upon the actual and estimated repayment schedules of the related debt and ABS issued.
Other assets include REO, derivative margin receivables, fixed assets, principal receivable, and other prepaid expenses. REO property acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value, and subsequently reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value (less estimated cost to sell).
12
Changes in the fair value of an REO property that has a fair value at or below its carrying amount are recorded in our consolidated statements of income as a component of market valuation adjustments, net. Derivative margin receivables reflect cash collateral Redwood has posted with our various derivative counterparties as required to satisfy the minimum margin requirements.
See Note 10 for further discussion on other assets.
Short-term debt includes master repurchase agreements, bank borrowings, and other forms of collateralized borrowings that expire within one year with various counterparties. These facilities may be unsecured or collateralized by cash, loans, or securities.
See Note 11 for further discussion on short-term debt.
Accrued interest payable includes interest that is due and payable to third-parties. Interest is generally paid within one to three months of recording the payable, based upon our remittance requirements. For borrowings where we have elected the fair value option, the associated accrued interest on these liabilities is measured at fair value. For financial liabilities where we have not elected the fair value option, the associated accrued interest carrying values approximate fair values.
The majority of the liabilities reported on our consolidated balance sheets represent ABS issued by bankruptcy-remote entities sponsored by Redwood. Sequoia and Acacia assets are held in the custody of securitization trustees and are not owned by Redwood. These trustees collect principal and interest payments (less servicing and related fees) from the assets and make corresponding principal and interest payments to the ABS investors.
Sequoia ABS issued are carried at their unpaid principal balances net of any unamortized discount or premium.
Acacia ABS issued are accounted for under the fair value option and carried at their estimated fair values. Changes in fair value (gains or losses) are reported in our consolidated statements of income through market valuation adjustments, net.
See Note 12 for further discussion on ABS issued.
Long-term debt includes trust preferred securities and subordinated notes at Redwood and is carried at its unpaid principal balance. Our long-term debt is unsecured with quarterly interest payments determined based upon a floating rate equal to the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin until it is redeemed in whole or matures at a future date.
See Note 13 for further discussion on long-term debt.
13
Net unrealized gains and losses on real estate securities available-for-sale and interest rate agreements previously designated as cash flow hedges are reported as components of accumulated other comprehensive income on our consolidated statements of equity and comprehensive income. Net unrealized gains and losses on securities and interest rate agreements held by our taxable subsidiaries that are reported in other comprehensive income are adjusted for the effects of taxation and may create deferred tax assets or liabilities.
Noncontrolling interest represents the aggregate limited partnership interests in the Fund held by third-parties. In accordance with GAAP, the noncontrolling interest of the Fund is shown as a component of equity on our consolidated balance sheets, and the portion of income allocable to third-parties is shown as net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in our consolidated statements of income. Equity attributable to noncontrolling interest is disclosed in our consolidated statements of equity and comprehensive income.
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding. Net income allocated to common shareholders represents net income applicable to common shareholders, less income allocated to participating securities (as described below). Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding plus amounts representing the dilutive effect of equity awards.
Accounting guidance on EPS defines unvested share-based payment awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends as participating securities that are included in computing EPS using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula under which EPS is calculated for common stock and participating securities according to dividends declared and participating rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to participating securities and common shares based on their respective rights to receive dividends.
See Note 15 for further discussion on equity.
In May 2010, our shareholders approved an amendment to our previously amended 2002 Redwood Trust, Inc. Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) for executive officers, employees, and non-employee directors. The amendment provided for an increase in the number of shares available for distribution under the plan. The Incentive Plan authorizes our Board of Directors (or a committee appointed by our Board of Directors) to grant incentive stock options (ISOs), non-qualifying stock options (NQSOs), performance stock units (PSUs), deferred stock units (DSUs), restricted stock, performance shares, performance units (including cash), stock appreciation rights, limited stock appreciation rights (awards), and dividend equivalent rights (DERs) to eligible recipients other than non-employee directors. These awards generally vest over a three- or four-year period. Non-employee directors are also provided annual awards under the Incentive Plan that generally vest immediately.
The cost of equity awards is determined in accordance with share-based payment accounting guidance and amortized over the vesting term using an accelerated method for equity awards granted prior to December 1, 2008. For equity awards granted after December 1, 2008, the cost of the awards is amortized
14
over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Timing differences between the accelerated and straight-line methods of amortization were determined to not be material to our financial statements.
In May 2009, our stockholders approved an amendment to our 2002 Redwood Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) to increase the number of shares available under the ESPP. The purpose of the ESPP is to give our employees an opportunity to acquire an equity interest in the Company through the purchase of shares of common stock at a discount. The ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase common stock at 85% of its fair value, subject to certain limits. Fair value as defined under the ESPP is the lesser of the closing market price of the common stock on the first day of the calendar year or the first day of the calendar quarter.
In May 2002, our Board of Directors approved our 2002 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (EDCP). The EDCP allows eligible employees and directors to defer portions of current salary and certain other forms of compensation. The Company matches some deferrals. Compensation deferred under the EDCP is recorded as an asset on our consolidated balance sheet and subject to the claims of our general creditors. The EDCP allows for the investment of deferrals in either an interest crediting account or DSUs.
We offer a tax-qualified 401(k) Plan to all employees for retirement savings. Under this Plan, employees are allowed to defer and invest up to 100% of their cash earnings, subject to the maximum 401(k) contribution limit set forth by the Internal Revenue Service. We match some employee contributions to encourage participation and to provide a retirement planning benefit to employees. Vesting of the 401(k) Plan matching contributions is based on the employees tenure at the Company, and over time, an employee becomes increasingly vested in both prior and new matching contributions.
See Note 16 for further discussion on equity compensation plans.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and the corresponding provisions of state law. To qualify as a REIT we must distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to shareholders (not including taxable income retained in our taxable subsidiaries) within the time frame set forth in the tax code and also meet certain other requirements related to assets, income, and stock ownership. We assess our tax positions for all open tax years and determine whether we have any material unrecognized liabilities in accordance with FASB guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. We record these liabilities to the extent we deem them incurred. We classify interest and penalties on material uncertain tax positions as interest expense and operating expense, respectively, in our consolidated statements of income.
See Note 18 for further discussion on taxes.
In April 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-02, A Creditors Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, which provides additional guidance to creditors for evaluating troubled debt restructurings. The amendments clarify the guidance in ASC 310-40, Receivables: Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors, which requires a creditor to classify a restructuring as a TDR if (1) the restructuring includes a concession by the creditor to the borrower and (2) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. The amended guidance requires a creditor to consider all
15
aspects of the restructuring to determine whether it has granted a concession, and includes additional guidance to identify concessions, as well as indicators for determining whether the debtor is facing financial difficulties. In addition, ASU 2011-02 ended the public-entity deferral of TDR disclosures in ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.
We adopted ASU 2011-02 in the second quarter of 2011. At June 30, 2011, the recorded investment in receivables for which the allowance for loan losses was previously measured under a general allowance for loan losses and are now impaired under ASC 310-10-35 was $2.8 million, and the allowance for loan losses associated with those receivable, on a basis of current evaluation of loss, was $0.3 million at June 30, 2011. For additional disclosures related to TDRs, see Note 7.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This ASU converges fair value measurement and disclosure guidance in U.S. GAAP with the guidance concurrently issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. While the amendments in ASU 2011-04 do not modify the requirements for when fair value measurements apply, they do generally represent clarifications on how to measure and disclose fair value under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is not permitted. ASU 2011-04 may increase our disclosures related to fair value measurements, but will not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The ASU eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income in the statement of stockholders equity and requires entities to present all non-owner changes in stockholders equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as two separate but consecutive statements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The amendments should be applied retrospectively and early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption of this ASU, our financial statement presentation will change.
We apply FASB guidance to determine whether we must consolidate transferred financial assets and VIEs for financial reporting purposes. Specifically, GAAP requires us to consider whether securitizations and other transfers of financial assets should be treated as sales or financings, as well as whether any VIEs (e.g., certain legal entities often used in securitization and other structured finance transactions) should be included in our consolidated financial statements.
The tables below present our analysis of VIEs where we maintain an interest, as distinguished by those we have consolidated for financial reporting purposes and those we have not. The principles of consolidation we apply require us to reassess our requirement to consolidate VIEs each quarter and therefore our determination may change based upon new facts and circumstances pertaining to each VIE. This could result in a material impact to our financial statements during subsequent reporting periods.
16
The VIEs we are required to consolidate include certain Sequoia securitization entities, the Acacia entities, and the Fund. Each securitization entity is independent of Redwood and of each other and the assets and liabilities are not owned by and are not obligations of Redwood, although we are exposed to certain financial risks associated with our role as the sponsor or manager of these entities. The following table presents a summary of the assets and liabilities of these VIEs. Intercompany balances have been eliminated for purposes of this presentation.
(Dollars in thousands) | Sequoia Entities |
Acacia Entities |
The Fund |
Total | ||||||||||||
Real estate loans | $ | 3,654,932 | $ | 12,698 | $ | | $ | 3,667,630 | ||||||||
Real estate securities | | 276,527 | | 276,527 | ||||||||||||
Other investments | | | | | ||||||||||||
Other assets | 21,991 | 37,113 | 5,103 | 64,207 | ||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 3,676,923 | $ | 326,338 | $ | 5,103 | $ | 4,008,364 | ||||||||
Asset-backed securities | $ | 3,566,001 | $ | 273,325 | $ | | $ | 3,839,326 | ||||||||
Other liabilities | 4,621 | 68,991 | 20 | 73,632 | ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | $ | 3,570,622 | $ | 342,316 | $ | 20 | $ | 3,912,958 | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,106 | $ | 2,106 | ||||||||
Number of VIEs | 38 | 10 | 1 | 49 |
We consolidate the assets and liabilities of certain Sequoia securitization entities issued prior to 2010, as we did not meet the sale criteria at the time we transferred financial assets to these entities. Had we not been the transferor and depositor of these securitizations, we would likely not have consolidated them as we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of these entities in accordance with ASC 810-10. In April 2010 and March 2011, we sponsored residential jumbo mortgage securitizations through our Sequoia program of $238 million and $295 million, respectively. We recorded the assets and liabilities of these entities on our consolidated balance sheets, as we did not meet the sale criteria at the time we transferred financial assets to these entities. Additionally, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary of these VIEs as our ongoing loss mitigation and resolution responsibilities provide us with the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities and our significant investment interests provide us with the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that are significant.
We consolidate the assets and liabilities of the Acacia securitization entities, as we did not meet the sale criteria at the time we transferred financial assets to these entities and we are the primary beneficiary of these VIEs. Our ongoing asset management responsibilities and call options provide us with the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these individual entities, and our equity investments in each entity provide us with the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that are significant.
We consolidate the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the Fund, as we determined that we are the primary beneficiary of this VIE. Our ongoing asset management responsibilities provide us with the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Funds economic performance, and our general and limited partnership interests provide us with the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that are significant. In the second quarter of 2011, the Fund sold all of its remaining investments. All partners will receive final distributions in the third quarter of 2011, upon which we will proceed with dissolution of the Fund.
17
Third-party VIEs are securitization entities in which we maintain an economic interest but do not sponsor. Our economic interest may include several securities from the same third-party VIE, and in those cases, the analysis is performed in consideration of all of our interests. The following table presents a summary of Redwoods interest in third-party VIEs at June 30, 2011, grouped by collateral type and ownership interest.
June 30, 2011 (Dollars in Thousands) |
Fair Value |
Number of VIEs |
||||||
Real estate securities at Redwood |
||||||||
Residential |
||||||||
Senior | $ | 593,350 | 95 | |||||
Re-REMIC | 77,575 | 7 | ||||||
Subordinate | 82,881 | 186 | ||||||
Commercial | 5,865 | 10 | ||||||
CDO | 1,403 | 9 | ||||||
Total Third-party Real Estate Securities | $ | 761,074 | 307 |
We determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of any third-party residential, commercial, or CDO entities, as we do not have the required power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. Specifically, we do not service or manage these entities or otherwise hold decision making powers that are significant. As a result of this assessment, we do not consolidate any of the underlying assets and liabilities of these third-party VIEs we only account for our specific interests in each.
Our assessments of whether we are required to consolidate a VIE may change in subsequent reporting periods based upon changing facts and circumstances pertaining to each VIE. Any related accounting changes could result in a material impact to our financial statements.
For financial reporting purposes, we follow a fair value hierarchy established under GAAP that is used to measure the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This hierarchy prioritizes relevant market inputs in order to determine an exit price, or the price at which an asset could be sold or a liability could be transferred in an orderly process that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale at the date of measurement. Level 1 inputs are observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices for an asset or liability that are obtained through corroboration with observable market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs (e.g., our own data or assumptions) that are used when there is little, if any, relevant market activity for the asset or liability being measured at fair value.
In certain cases, inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability being measured.
18
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded or disclosed at fair value at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate loans (held-for-investment) |
||||||||||||||||
Residential loans securitized | $ | 3,654,932 | $ | 3,262,580 | $ | 3,542,158 | $ | 3,114,288 | ||||||||
Residential loans unsecuritized | 203,465 | 207,086 | 253,082 | 253,052 | ||||||||||||
Commercial loans unsecuritized | 71,168 | 71,200 | 30,536 | 30,887 | ||||||||||||
Real estate loans (held-for-sale) | 1,836 | 1,836 | 1,855 | 1,855 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans (fair value) | 12,698 | 12,698 | 19,850 | 19,850 | ||||||||||||
Trading securities | 296,978 | 296,978 | 329,717 | 329,717 | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities | 740,623 | 740,623 | 825,119 | 825,119 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 79,977 | 79,977 | 46,937 | 46,937 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets | 4,013 | 4,013 | 8,051 | 8,051 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash | 35,673 | 35,673 | 24,524 | 24,524 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 13,690 | 13,690 | 13,782 | 13,782 | ||||||||||||
REO (included in other assets) | 9,880 | 9,880 | 14,481 | 14,481 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Short-term debt | 40,891 | 40,891 | 44,137 | 44,137 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable | 6,422 | 6,422 | 5,930 | 5,930 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | 82,639 | 82,639 | 83,115 | 83,115 | ||||||||||||
ABS issued |
||||||||||||||||
ABS issued Sequoia | 3,566,001 | 3,085,586 | 3,458,501 | 2,959,997 | ||||||||||||
ABS issued Acacia | 273,325 | 273,325 | 303,077 | 303,077 | ||||||||||||
Total ABS issued | 3,839,326 | 3,358,911 | 3,761,578 | 3,263,074 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 139,500 | 78,120 | 139,500 | 75,330 |
We did not elect the fair value option for any financial instruments that we acquired in the first six months of 2011. We have elected the fair value option for all of the commercial loans, trading securities, and ABS issued at Acacia, as well as certain residential securities and CDOs at Redwood.
19
The following table presents assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
June 30, 2011 (In Thousands) |
Carrying Value |
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans | $ | 12,698 | $ | | $ | | $ | 12,698 | ||||||||
Trading securities | 296,978 | | | 296,978 | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities | 740,623 | | | 740,623 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets | 4,013 | 276 | 3,737 | | ||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | 82,639 | 1,425 | 81,214 | | ||||||||||||
ABS issued Acacia | 273,325 | | | 273,325 |
The following table presents additional information about Level 3 assets and liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Commercial Real Estate Loans |
Trading Securities |
AFS Securities |
Derivative Assets |
ABS Issued Acacia |
|||||||||||||||
Beginning balance December 31, 2010 | $ | 19,850 | $ | 329,717 | $ | 825,119 | $ | 1 | $ | 303,077 | ||||||||||
Principal paydowns | (8,694 | ) | (30,261 | ) | (58,416 | ) | | (42,873 | ) | |||||||||||
Gains in net income, net | 1,542 | 10,322 | 19,064 | | 6,757 | |||||||||||||||
Losses in OCI, net | | | (28,170 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Acquisitions | | | 46,498 | | | |||||||||||||||
Sales | | (13,035 | ) | (63,525 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Other settlements, net | | 235 | 53 | (1 | ) | 6,364 | ||||||||||||||
Ending Balance June 30, 2011 | $ | 12,698 | $ | 296,978 | $ | 740,623 | $ | | $ | 273,325 |
20
The following table presents the portion of gains or losses included in our consolidated statements of income that were attributable to Level 3 assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and still held at June 30, 2011 and 2010. Gains or losses incurred on assets or liabilities sold, matured, called, or fully written down during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are not included in this presentation.
Included in Net Income | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate loans | $ | 1,323 | $ | 2,978 | $ | 1,542 | $ | 7,344 | ||||||||
Trading securities | (9,557 | ) | 5,042 | 1,070 | 17,364 | |||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities | (1,466 | ) | (4,216 | ) | (2,469 | ) | (6,134 | ) | ||||||||
Derivative assets | | 15 | | (5 | ) | |||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | | 49 | | 109 | ||||||||||||
ABS issued Acacia | 17,380 | 11,257 | (6,757 | ) | 6,004 |
The following table presents information on assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2011.
Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying Value |
Fair Value Measurements Using | Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate loans (held-for-sale) | $ | 1,836 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,836 | $ | 8 | $ | 11 | ||||||||||||
REO | 9,880 | | | 9,880 | (244 | ) | (1,162 | ) |
21
The following table presents the components of market valuation adjustments, net, recorded in our consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate loans (fair value) | $ | 1,323 | $ | 2,978 | $ | 1,542 | $ | 7,344 | ||||||||
Real estate loans (held-for-sale) | 8 | 296 | 11 | 176 | ||||||||||||
Trading securities | (9,594 | ) | 6,330 | 10,322 | 18,479 | |||||||||||
REO | (244 | ) | (1,285 | ) | (1,162 | ) | (1,359 | ) | ||||||||
Impairments on AFS securities | (1,466 | ) | (4,216 | ) | (4,088 | ) | (6,162 | ) | ||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
ABS issued Acacia | 17,380 | 11,257 | (6,757 | ) | 6,004 | |||||||||||
Derivative instruments, net | (18,554 | ) | (22,485 | ) | (16,755 | ) | (42,844 | ) | ||||||||
Market Valuation Adjustments, Net | $ | (11,147 | ) | $ | (7,125 | ) | $ | (16,887 | ) | $ | (18,362 | ) |
A description of the instruments measured at fair value as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 valuation hierarchy is listed below.
| Real estate loans |
| Residential real estate loan fair values are determined by available market quotes and discounted cash flow analyses (Level 3). |
| Commercial real estate loan fair values are determined by available market quotes and discounted cash flow analyses (Level 3). The availability of market quotes for all of our commercial loans is limited. Any changes in fair value are primarily a result of instrument specific credit risk. |
| Real estate securities |
| Real estate securities are residential, commercial, CDO, and other asset-backed securities that are illiquid in nature and trade infrequently. Fair values are determined by discounted cash flow analyses and other valuation techniques using market pricing assumptions that are confirmed by third-party dealer/pricing indications, to the extent available. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are predominantly Level 3 in nature, due to the lack of readily available market quotes and related inputs. Relevant market indicators that are factored in the analyses include bid/ask spreads, credit losses, interest rates, and prepayment speeds. Estimated fair values are based on applying the market indicators to generate discounted cash flows (Level 3). |
| We request and consider indications of value (marks) from third-party dealers to assist us in our valuation process. For June 30, 2011, we received dealer marks on 83% of our securities. In the aggregate, our internal valuations of the securities on which we received dealer marks were 3% lower (i.e., more conservative) than the aggregate dealer marks. |
| Derivative assets and liabilities |
| Our derivative instruments include interest rate agreements, TBAs, and financial futures. Fair values of derivative instruments are determined using quoted prices from active markets when |
22
available or valuation models and are verified by valuations provided by dealers active in derivative markets. TBA and financial futures fair values are generally obtained using quoted prices from active markets (Level 1). Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves, measures of volatility, prepayment rates, and correlations of such inputs. Model inputs for interest rate agreements can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment (Level 2). For other derivatives, valuations are based on various factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads, and credit considerations for which we rely on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, managements best estimate is used (Level 3). |
| Cash and cash equivalents |
| Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Fair values equal carrying values. |
| Restricted cash |
| Restricted cash primarily includes interest-earning cash balances in ABS entities and the Fund for the purpose of distribution to bondholders or limited partners, and reinvestment. Due to the short-term nature of the restrictions, fair values approximate carrying values. |
| Accrued interest receivable and payable |
| Accrued interest receivable and payable includes interest due on our assets and payable on our liabilities. Due to the short-term nature of when these interest payments will be received or paid, fair values approximate carrying values. |
| Short-term debt |
| Short-term debt includes our credit facilities that mature within one year. Short-term debt is generally at an adjustable rate. Fair values approximate carrying values. |
| ABS issued |
| ABS issued includes asset-backed securities issued through our Sequoia and Acacia programs. These instruments are illiquid in nature and trade infrequently, if at all. Fair values are determined by discounted cash flow analyses and other valuation techniques using market pricing assumptions that are confirmed by third-party dealer/pricing indications, to the extent available. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are predominantly Level 3, due to the nature of these instruments and the lack of readily available market quotes. Relevant market indicators factored into the analyses include dealer price indications to the extent available, bid/ask spreads, external spreads, collateral credit losses, interest rates and collateral prepayment speeds. Estimated fair values are based on applying the market indicators to generate discounted cash flows (Level 3). |
| We request and consider indications of value (marks) from third-party dealers to assist us in our valuation process. For June 30, 2011, we received dealer marks on 95% of our ABS issued. Our internal valuations of our ABS issued on which we received dealer marks were 7% higher (i.e., more conservative) than the aggregate dealer marks. |
23
| Long-term debt |
| Long-term debt includes our subordinated notes and trust preferred securities. Fair values are determined using comparable market indicators of current pricing. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are predominantly Level 3 due to the nature of these instruments and the lack of readily available market quotes. Estimated fair values are based on applying the market indicators to generate discounted cash flows (Level 3). |
| REO |
| REO includes properties owned in satisfaction of foreclosed loans. Fair values are determined using available market quotes, appraisals, broker price opinions, comparable properties, or other indications of value (Level 3). |
We invest in residential real estate loans that we acquire from third-party originators and commercial loans that we originate or acquire from third-party originators. These loans are financed through the Sequoia and Acacia entities that we sponsor or with equity and long-term debt. We do not currently service any residential loans. Commercial loans originated by our subsidiary, Redwood Commercial Mortgage Corporation, in 2010 and 2011 and held-for-investment are currently serviced by us.
The following table summarizes the classifications and carrying value of the residential and commercial real estate loans recorded on our consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 (In Thousands) |
Redwood | Sequoia | Acacia | Total Loans |
||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||
Held-for-sale | $ | 1,836 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,836 | ||||||||
Held-for-investment | 203,465 | 3,654,932 | | 3,858,397 | ||||||||||||
Total residential real estate loans | 205,301 | 3,654,932 | | 3,860,233 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||
Fair value | | | 12,698 | 12,698 | ||||||||||||
Held-for-investment | 71,168 | | | 71,168 | ||||||||||||
Total commercial real estate loans | 71,168 | | 12,698 | 83,866 | ||||||||||||
Total Real Estate Loans | $ | 276,469 | $ | 3,654,932 | $ | 12,698 | $ | 3,944,099 |
December 31, 2010 (In Thousands) |
Redwood | Sequoia | Acacia | Total Loans |
||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||
Held-for-sale | $ | 1,855 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,855 | ||||||||
Held-for-investment | 253,081 | 3,542,159 | | 3,795,240 | ||||||||||||
Total residential real estate loans | 254,936 | 3,542,159 | | 3,797,095 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||
Fair value | | | 19,850 | 19,850 | ||||||||||||
Held-for-investment | 30,536 | | | 30,536 | ||||||||||||
Total commercial real estate loans | 30,536 | | 19,850 | 50,386 | ||||||||||||
Total Real Estate Loans | $ | 285,472 | $ | 3,542,159 | $ | 19,850 | $ | 3,847,481 |
24
Residential real estate loans held-for-sale are owned at Redwood and financed with equity and long-term debt. At both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were eleven residential loans held-for-sale with $3 million in outstanding principal value and a lower of cost or fair value of $2 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we purchased $254 million of residential loans in connection with our Sequoia securitization program.
The following table provides additional information on residential real estate loans held-for-investment at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(In Thousands) | June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
Principal value | $ | 3,882,603 | $ | 3,815,273 | ||||
Unamortized premium, net | 38,100 | 42,399 | ||||||
Recorded investment | 3,920,703 | 3,857,672 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (62,306 | ) | (62,432 | ) | ||||
Carrying Value | $ | 3,858,397 | $ | 3,795,240 |
Of the $3.9 billion of principal value and $38 million of unamortized premium on loans held-for-investment at June 30, 2011, $1.6 billion of principal value and $25 million of unamortized premium relate to residential loans acquired prior to July 1, 2004. During the first six months of 2011, 4% of these residential loans prepaid and we amortized 9% of the premium based upon the accounting elections we apply. For residential loans acquired after July 1, 2004, the principal value was $2.3 billion and the unamortized premium was $13 million. During the first six months of 2011, 5% of these loans prepaid and we amortized 7% of the premium.
Of the $3.8 billion of principal value and $42 million of unamortized premium on loans held-for-investment at December 31, 2010, $1.7 billion of principal value and $28 million of unamortized premium relate to residential loans acquired prior to July 1, 2004. For residential loans acquired after July 1, 2004, the principal value was $2.1 billion and the unamortized premium was $15 million.
Commercial real estate loans at fair value are owned at the consolidated Acacia securitization entities. At June 30, 2011, there were three commercial real estate loans at fair value with an aggregate outstanding principal value of $14 million and an aggregate fair value of $13 million. At December 31, 2010, there were four commercial real estate loans at fair value with an aggregate outstanding principal value of $23 million and an aggregate fair value of $20 million.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we originated or acquired three commercial real estate loans with an outstanding principal balance of $29 million. At June 30, 2011, there were nine commercial real estate loans held-for-investment (one of which was purchased prior to 2010) with an outstanding principal value of $72 million and a carrying value of $71 million. At December 31, 2010, there were four commercial real estate loans held-for-investment with an outstanding principal value and carrying value of $31 million.
25
For residential real estate loans held-for-investment, we establish and maintain an allowance for loan losses. The allowance includes a component for loans collectively evaluated for impairment that includes pools of residential loans owned at Sequoia securitization entities, and a component for loans individually evaluated for impairment that includes modified residential loans from Sequoia entities that have been determined to be troubled debt restructurings.
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 62,922 | $ | 61,169 | $ | 62,432 | $ | 54,220 | ||||||||
Charge-offs, net | (2,197 | ) | (4,012 | ) | (4,515 | ) | (6,539 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,581 | 4,321 | 4,389 | 13,797 | ||||||||||||
Balance at End of Period | $ | 62,306 | $ | 61,478 | $ | 62,306 | $ | 61,478 |
During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, there were $2 million and $4 million of charge-offs, respectively, in our residential loan portfolio that reduced our allowance for loan losses. These charge-offs arose from $7 million and $13 million of defaulted loan principal, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, there were $5 million and $7 million of charge-offs, respectively, in our residential loan portfolio that reduced our allowance for loan losses. These charge-offs arose from $15 million and $21 million of defaulted loan principal, respectively. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we did not record any interest income on individually impaired loans.
We collectively evaluate most of our residential loans for impairment based on the characteristics of the loan pools underlying the securitization entities that own the loans. These characteristics, which include loan product types, credit characteristics, and origination years, are what management primarily uses to establish the allowance for residential loans. The collective analysis is further divided into two segments. The first segment reflects our estimate of losses on delinquent loans within each loan pool. These loss estimates are determined by applying the loss factors described in Note 3 to the delinquent loans, including our expectations of the timing of defaults and the loss severities we expect once defaults occur. The second segment relates to our estimate of losses incurred on nondelinquent loans within each loan pool. This estimate is based on losses we expect to realize over a 23 month loss confirmation period, which is based on our historical loss experience as well as consideration of the loss factors described in Note 3.
The following table summarizes the balances for loans collectively evaluated for impairment at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(In Thousands) | June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
Unpaid principal balance | $ | 3,870,056 | $ | 3,801,921 | ||||
Recorded investment | 3,908,849 | 3,844,372 | ||||||
Related allowance | 58,558 | 57,804 |
26
The following table shows the recorded investment in residential loans collectively evaluated for impairment at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(In Thousands) | 30 59 Days Past Due |
60 89 Days Past Due |
90+ Days Past Due |
Current | Total Loans |
|||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | $ | 54,843 | $ | 20,826 | $ | 131,991 | $ | 3,701,189 | $ | 3,908,849 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | 65,708 | 21,674 | 133,695 | 3,623,295 | 3,844,372 |
The following table summarizes the balances for loans individually evaluated for impairment at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(In Thousands) | June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
Unpaid principal balance | $ | 12,547 | $ | 13,352 | ||||
Recorded investment | 11,854 | 13,300 | ||||||
Related allowance | 3,748 | 4,628 | ||||||
Average recorded investment for the three months ended | 12,199 | 13,014 |
The following table shows the recorded investment in residential loans individually evaluated for impairment at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(In Thousands) | 30 59 Days Past Due |
60 89 Days Past Due |
90+ Days Past Due |
Current | Total Loans |
|||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | $ | 1,031 | $ | 709 | $ | 804 | $ | 9,310 | $ | 11,854 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | 2,604 | | 1,046 | 9,650 | 13,300 |
As a percent of total recorded investment, 99% of residential loans held-for-investment on our balance sheet at June 30, 2011, were first lien, predominately prime quality loans, at the time of origination. The remaining 1% of loans at June 30, 2011 were second lien, home equity lines of credit. The weighted average original loan-to-value (LTV) for our residential loans held-for-investment outstanding at June 30, 2011, was 66%. The weighted average Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) score for the borrowers of these loans (at origination) was 736.
Due to the uniform product and credit characteristics of our residential loans, we consider the year of origination to be a general indicator of credit performance. The following table displays the recorded investment and year of origination for residential loans recorded on our consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(In Thousands) | June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
2003 & Earlier | $ | 1,851,493 | $ | 1,939,618 | ||||
2004 | 1,084,285 | 1,116,358 | ||||||
2005 | 131,794 | 136,481 | ||||||
2006 | 189,212 | 191,945 | ||||||
2007 | 68,687 | 75,136 | ||||||
2008 | | | ||||||
2009 | 169,817 | 189,355 | ||||||
2010 | 303,517 | 208,779 | ||||||
2011 | 121,898 | | ||||||
Total Recorded Investment | $ | 3,920,703 | $ | 3,857,672 |
27
For commercial real estate loans classified as held-for-investment, we establish and maintain an allowance for loan losses on an individual basis for those loans we have determined to be impaired as of the reporting date. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no delinquent or impaired commercial loans.
Of the $71 million recorded investment in commercial loans held-for-investment at June 30, 2011, 57% were originated in 2011 and 43% were originated in 2010. Of the $31 million of recorded investment in commercial loans held-for-investment at December 31, 2010, 99% were originated in the fourth quarter of 2010 and 1% were originated in 2004.
We invest in third-party residential, commercial, and CDO securities. The following table presents the fair values of our real estate securities by collateral type and entity at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 (In Thousands) |
Redwood | The Fund | Acacia | Total Securities |
||||||||||||
Residential | $ | 753,806 | $ | | $ | 213,755 | $ | 967,561 | ||||||||
Commercial | 5,865 | | 42,274 | 48,139 | ||||||||||||
CDO | 1,403 | | 20,498 | 21,901 | ||||||||||||
Total Real Estate Securities | $ | 761,074 | $ | | $ | 276,527 | $ | 1,037,601 |
December 31, 2010 (In Thousands) |
Redwood | The Fund | Acacia | Total Securities |
||||||||||||
Residential | $ | 814,683 | $ | 19,011 | $ | 248,494 | $ | 1,082,188 | ||||||||
Commercial | 7,496 | | 43,828 | 51,324 | ||||||||||||
CDO | 1,038 | 4,245 | 16,041 | 21,324 | ||||||||||||
Total Real Estate Securities | $ | 823,217 | $ | 23,256 | $ | 308,363 | $ | 1,154,836 |
At June 30, 2011, there were $4 million of AFS residential securities that had contractual maturities greater than five years but less than ten years, and the remainder of our real estate securities had contractual maturities greater than ten years.
28
The following table presents our securities by accounting classification, collateral type, and ownership entity at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 (In Thousands) |
Trading | AFS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redwood | Acacia | Total | Redwood | The Fund | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Senior Securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential prime | $ | | $ | 3,645 | $ | 3,645 | $ | 285,946 | $ | | $ | 285,946 | ||||||||||||
Residential non-prime | 18,686 | 104,110 | 122,796 | 288,718 | | 288,718 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | | 11,405 | 11,405 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Senior Securities | 18,686 | 119,160 | 137,846 | 574,664 | | 574,664 | ||||||||||||||||||
Re-REMIC Securities | | | | 77,575 | | 77,575 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinate Securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential prime | 302 | 40,236 | 40,538 | 71,543 | | 71,543 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential non-prime | 160 | 65,764 | 65,924 | 10,876 | | 10,876 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | | 30,869 | 30,869 | 5,865 | | 5,865 | ||||||||||||||||||
CDO | 1,303 | 20,498 | 21,801 | 100 | | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Subordinate Securities | 1,765 | 157,367 | 159,132 | 88,384 | | 88,384 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Real Estate Securities | $ | 20,451 | $ | 276,527 | $ | 296,978 | $ | 740,623 | $ | | $ | 740,623 |
December 31, 2010 (In Thousands) |
Trading | AFS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redwood | Acacia | Total | Redwood | The Fund | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Senior Securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential prime | $ | | $ | 4,412 | $ | 4,412 | $ | 315,891 | $ | | $ | 315,891 | ||||||||||||
Residential non-prime | 19,742 | 117,623 | 137,365 | 326,365 | 12,915 | 339,280 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | | 11,000 | 11,000 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Senior Securities | 19,742 | 133,035 | 152,777 | 642,256 | 12,915 | 655,171 | ||||||||||||||||||
Re-REMIC Securities | | | | 85,077 | | 85,077 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinate Securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential prime | 386 | 49,620 | 50,006 | 53,846 | | 53,846 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential non-prime | 188 | 76,839 | 77,027 | 13,188 | 6,096 | 19,284 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | | 32,828 | 32,828 | 7,496 | | 7,496 | ||||||||||||||||||
CDO | 1,038 | 16,041 | 17,079 | | 4,245 | 4,245 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Subordinate Securities | 1,612 | 175,328 | 176,940 | 74,530 | 10,341 | 84,871 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Real Estate Securities | $ | 21,354 | $ | 308,363 | $ | 329,717 | $ | 801,863 | $ | 23,256 | $ | 825,119 |
Senior securities are those interests in a securitization that have the first right to cash flows and are last in line to absorb losses. Re-REMIC securities, as presented herein, were created through the resecuritization of certain senior interests to provide additional credit support to those interests. These re-REMIC securities are therefore subordinate to the remaining senior interest, but senior to any subordinate tranches of the securitization from which they were created. Subordinate securities are all interests below senior and re-REMIC interests.
For purposes of the table above, the prime or non-prime designation used to categorize our residential securities is based upon the general credit characteristics of the residential loans underlying each security at the time of origination. For example, prime residential loans are generally characterized by lower LTV ratios, and are made to borrowers with higher FICO scores. Non-prime residential loans are generally characterized by higher LTV ratios and may have been made to borrowers with lower credit scores or
29
impaired credit histories (while exhibiting the ability to repay their loans). Regardless of whether or not the loans backing a mortgage-backed security were designated as prime or non-prime at origination, there is a risk that the borrower may not be able to repay the loan.
We elected the fair value option for certain securities at Redwood and the Acacia entities, now classified as trading securities. The unpaid principal balance of these trading securities was $1.2 billion and $2.1 billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
We often purchase AFS securities at a discount to their outstanding principal values. To the extent we purchase an AFS security that has a likelihood of incurring a loss, we generally do not amortize into income the portion of the purchase discount that we do not expect to collect due to the inherent credit risk of the security. We may also expense a portion of our investment in the security to the extent we believe that principal losses will exceed the purchase discount. We designate the amount of principal face that we do not expect to receive and will not amortize into income as a credit reserve on the security, with any remaining net unamortized discounts or premiums amortized into income over time using the interest method.
The following table presents the components of carrying value (which equals fair value) of AFS securities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 (In Thousands) |
Residential | Commercial | CDO | Total | ||||||||||||
Current face | $ | 1,111,215 | $ | 58,128 | $ | 11,863 | $ | 1,181,206 | ||||||||
Credit reserve | (240,899 | ) | (48,987 | ) | (10,780 | ) | (300,666 | ) | ||||||||
Net unamortized discount | (243,662 | ) | (4,362 | ) | (1,083 | ) | (249,107 | ) | ||||||||
Amortized cost | 626,654 | 4,779 | | 631,433 | ||||||||||||
Gross unrealized gains | 121,524 | 1,928 | 100 | 123,552 | ||||||||||||
Gross unrealized losses | (13,520 | ) | (842 | ) | | (14,362 | ) | |||||||||
Carrying Value | $ | 734,658 | $ | 5,865 | $ | 100 | $ | 740,623 |
December 31, 2010 (In Thousands) |
Residential | Commercial | CDO | Total | ||||||||||||
Current face | $ | 1,257,601 | $ | 89,103 | $ | 89,476 | $ | 1,436,180 | ||||||||
Credit reserve | (297,849 | ) | (76,979 | ) | (88,394 | ) | (463,222 | ) | ||||||||
Net unamortized (discount) premium | (291,093 | ) | (5,591 | ) | 11,485 | (285,199 | ) | |||||||||
Amortized cost | 668,659 | 6,533 | 12,567 | 687,759 | ||||||||||||
Gross unrealized gains | 153,125 | 1,604 | | 154,729 | ||||||||||||
Gross unrealized losses | (8,406 | ) | (641 | ) | (8,322 | ) | (17,369 | ) | ||||||||
Carrying Value | $ | 813,378 | $ | 7,496 | $ | 4,245 | $ | 825,119 |
The following table presents the changes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, of the unamortized discount and designated credit reserves on AFS securities.
30
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 (In Thousands) | Residential | Commercial | CDO | |||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Reserve |
Unamortized Discount, Net |
Credit Reserve |
Unamortized Discount, Net |
Credit Reserve |
Unamortized Premium, Net |
|||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance March 31, 2011 | $ | 280,478 | $ | 259,469 | $ | 64,717 | $ | 4,784 | $ | 29,505 | $ | 520 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net (discount) premium | | (10,497 | ) |